The Census is Null and Void – now there must be an inquiry into how and why it failed

Look, I’m not suggesting a Royal Commission here, but I absolutely think that we need to ask some tough questions and get solid answers to ensure that all government departments and agencies learn from this, and we somehow begin the process of restoring faith in “online” activities like this.

I’m sorry, but the 2016 Census has to be declared null and void.  Millions of people have completed it, Millions more will try to over the coming days and weeks, but many more, possibly millions just won’t bother.  We risk getting the results and finding that they just don’t stack up, and the last thing we need are governments of all levels using irregular data to plan important services.

Regardless, $10 million was spent just on the system, goodness knows the total cost which is yet to be revealed.  Almost half a million dollars of which was spent on “Load Testing” to confirm it would all handle as it should.

It didn’t.

The Prime Minister needs to appoint an independent consultant with complete access to the ABS to find out what happened.

Why? Because Australians simply won’t trust an “online census” again, let alone it sets back any future “online” government services 5-10 years.  Don’t even think of proposing electronic voting right now!

There are some simple questions that need to be asked.  Let me help the Prime Minister with these suggestions – and I’d welcome your contributions in the comments below.

  1. When load testing was conducted, who set the benchmark by which the tests should be judged?
  2. How many concurrent, per second, and hourly users and submissions was the test setup to simulate?
  3. How was that number calculated in the first place?
  4. Who was responsible for that calculation?
  5. How many companies responded to the tender for Load Testing the 2016 Census site and forms?
  6. What was the basis for choosing the winning tender for the Load Testing?
  7. What server infrastructure was put in place to handle the scalable load required for Census 2016 Online?
  8. What consultation took place with large private online enterprises to compare or gain advice on handling large scale online traffic?
  9. Who was responsible for the communication campaign leading up to Census 2016.
  10. Why was the campaign not targeted more toward spreading the “load” of submissions over a greater period – given the lengthy window within which submissions are being accepted.

That’s just a start.

We need some answers.

Recent Posts

  • Tech

Urgent calls to replace or update older Samsung phones amid Triple Zero call concerns

The Telco industry has been razor focussed on the Triple Zero system in recent weeks…

14 hours ago
  • Tech

The new Apple MacBook Pro 14 with M5 is the one you get if its your first time going Pro

It's hard to review a new laptop model when the previous generation and even generations…

1 day ago
  • Tech

Using the new Apple Vision Pro – the M5 Upgrade keeps the dream alive

The second generation Apple Vision Pro might be the same thing with more power and…

1 day ago
  • Tech

Hands on with Apple’s updated iPad Pro with M5 Processor

Same Same but different, that's how you'd describe the brand new iPad Pro with Apple's…

1 day ago
  • Tech

Review: Dell Pro 13 Premium — a complete productivity workhorse without the bells and whistles

Earlier this year Dell announced the new naming platform for their laptops with the Dell…

2 days ago
  • Tech

Review: Sennheiser HDB 630 Bluetooth headphones — audiophile quality sound without pesky cables

Just a few days ago, Sennheiser announced its foray into the wireless audiophile headphone market…

2 days ago